The Video Game Wasteland
- mfedericomorenodir
- May 25, 2025
- 10 min read

The video game industry is undergoing seismic shifts—some exciting, many alarming. This piece explores the current problems threatening the long-term sustainability of gaming, speculates on a potential collapse, and envisions what gaming could look like in a post-collapse world.
The Ownership Problem: From Physical Games to Licensed Digital Rentals

There was a time—not that long ago—when purchasing a video game meant owning it.
Whether it was an Nintendo 64 console, a disc for your PlayStation 2, or a CD-ROM for your PC, you bought the game, brought it home, and it was yours. You could lend it to a friend, resell it, or keep it for decades. A new game typically cost $50–$60, and that was that.
But that ownership model has been quietly eroded by the convenience and ubiquity of digital storefronts. Today, the vast majority of people no longer own their games in any real sense. Instead, what we now “buy” is a license—a form of long-term rental that grants access to the game under the terms of the platform's digital rights agreement. These licenses can be revoked, expire, or become inaccessible based on platform policy, region restrictions, or company closures.

EA, Steam, and other major digital storefronts are notorious for strict licensing agreements. There are numerous cases of players losing access to games permanently: some due to revoked licenses, others because a game was delisted, servers were shut down, or the user’s account was suspended. Even region changes can cause a previously accessible game to disappear from a library.
The public largely remains unaware of this shift. Most consumers still assume they “own” what they’ve bought. But the reality is murkier. These licenses are cheap and convenient—games regularly go on sale for $5 or less—making it difficult to muster mass resistance. And for companies, this model is wildly profitable: they maintain control over distribution, limit second-hand markets, and can change or remove content without warning or compensation.
Subscription Models and Streaming: A New Frontier or a Broken Future?
The next frontier goes even further—eliminating not just physical games, but physical consoles altogether. Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass is leading this charge. Rather than buying individual titles or consoles, users subscribe to a monthly service that offers access to a rotating library of games. On paper, it sounds like the Netflix of gaming. In practice, it’s more complicated.

Small games may still be downloaded and played locally on phones, PCs, and other devices. But more complex “blockbuster” titles are increasingly being streamed via cloud services—run on remote servers and delivered to the player’s screen. Smart TVs are the logical endpoint of this model, becoming the de facto consoles of the future. But these devices lack the power of dedicated hardware, and streaming introduces serious issues: lag, input delay, and unreliable performance. Google Stadia, once pitched as the future of gaming, collapsed under these very issues.

Rising Prices and the Collapse of the Sale Era
As hardware becomes more powerful and development costs rise, game prices are climbing accordingly. The upcoming Nintendo Switch 2 is expected to debut new games at $80, with Microsoft and others likely to follow. The days of frequent, deep discounts are vanishing as well.
Steam—once seen as the king of game sales—is tightening its control over pricing, licensing, and DRM, pushing players away from the platform they once trusted most.
Backwards Compatibility and Sony’s Missteps
Sony’s handling of backwards compatibility reveals another layer of the ownership crisis. While the PlayStation 5 supports PS4 games, PS3 titles are locked behind paid streaming services or repurchased remasters—again plagued by latency and input delay.
Customers have consistently expressed frustration with Sony's unwillingness to provide robust, native backwards compatibility. Instead of supporting legacy discs or offering downloads for owned titles, Sony has opted for a monetized and inconvenient solution that alienates loyal players and erodes consumer trust.
The Decay of Physical Media

Physical games are also fading from store shelves. Many titles are digital-only, and even physical releases often require internet connections or downloads to function. Compounding this is the fragility of physical media itself. Discs and cartridges degrade over time, and without proper archival methods, some games are being lost permanently. Preservation efforts are increasingly reliant on unofficial emulation and modding communities, rather than publishers.
Gaming Culture in 2025: Changing Faces and Attitudes
Critics once described gaming culture as elitist, consumerist, and toxic—particularly hostile to women, LGBTQ+ players, and newcomers. That reputation peaked during the mid-2000s and early 2010s. But the arrival of the Nintendo Switch marked a cultural shift. It bridged the gap between handheld and home consoles, offering a versatile, accessible platform with a family-friendly image.

Nintendo’s kid-friendly approach proved key to broadening gaming’s demographic. Titles like Animal Crossing and Stardew Valley drew in women and girls who previously felt unwelcome in the gaming space. The Switch also hosts popular AAA titles, meaning that many new players—especially women—entered gaming through these welcoming games before expanding to more traditional genres.
On platforms like Twitch and YouTube, women streamers and content creators are are some of the leading video gaming personalities. Turns out, girls like video games just as much as boys do.
Free-to-Play Games, Loot Boxes, and the Monetization Crisis

Games like Fortnite introduced a new model: free to play, with optional purchases for cosmetics and seasonal battle passes. The success of Fortnite led to the proliferation of this model, seen in games like Call of Duty: Warzone, Apex Legends, and Overwatch 2.
But not all monetization models are created equal. Loot boxes, which offer random rewards for real money, have drawn widespread criticism for resembling gambling. In some countries—including Belgium and the Netherlands—loot boxes have been banned or restricted. Legal pressure is mounting worldwide, with regulators increasingly concerned about targeting children and exploiting addictive behavior.
Mobile Gaming and Monetization Creep

The world of mobile gaming has also expanded rapidly, offering experiences comparable to console titles. Games like Fortnite and CoD have fully functional mobile versions, showing that smartphones can support high-end gameplay.
But console elitism has allowed more predatory practices to thrive in mobile ecosystems. Monetization is more aggressive—pay-to-win mechanics, intrusive ads, and energy timers are standard. Now, publishers are attempting to import these lucrative tactics into console and PC gaming, meeting stiff resistance from traditional gamers. But perhaps worse, success with casual ones.
This blending of mobile and console experiences raises questions about where gaming is headed: Will traditional game design hold, or will convenience and monetization dominate?
Disillusionment and the End of Gamer Optimism
Amid all this, many long-time gamers are growing disillusioned. What was once an accessible, joyful hobby now feels like an over-monetized and over-controlled consumer trap.
Behind the scenes, the pressure to deliver massive, cinematic, open-world games has broken the backs of many studios. Crunch culture—a toxic environment where developers work grueling hours for months on end—remains widespread. High-profile studios have faced public backlash for mistreating employees, cutting corners, or shipping unfinished products.
The launch of Cyberpunk 2077 is perhaps the most notorious example: years of crunch, misleading marketing, and a buggy launch tarnished a once-hyped game and shook consumer confidence. Developers are burning out. Good studios are slowing down to protect their staff, but that also means delays and longer development cycles.
Indie Games: From Underdogs to Overwhelmed
Indie developers were once the vanguard of creative resistance against AAA homogeny. And to some extent, they still are. Games like Hades, Undertale, and Stardew Valley proved that a small team—or even one person—could create a masterpiece.
But as indie games get more ambitious, they run into the same problems: long dev cycles, unfinished launches, and unsustainable pressure. Many are released in “early access,” asking players to pay for a game that’s still being built. Sometimes this works. But just as often, it results in unfinished, buggy, or abandoned projects—leaving consumers paying full price for broken promises.
Modding and Emulation: A New Hope

The silver lining, the greatest hope, and quite possibly the only real answer to the many problems currently plaguing the gaming industry may well be modding and emulation.
Modding, at its core, is the ability for computer-literate gamers to dive into the code of a game, swap out assets, and sometimes even craft entirely new experiences using existing frameworks.
For many, this starts as a creative outlet or a fun technical challenge. Others are driven by a desire to fix incomplete, buggy, or outright broken games. Some mods modernize old titles—updating menu systems, balancing gameplay, and refining mechanics in ways that make these older games feel relevant again. DIY remasters.
These modders have founded perhaps the most prolific and passionate subculture in gaming. Their contributions—often free online—have kept countless games alive long after their publishers moved on. Many modders even team up to build completely new experiences, often with little connection to the original games they’re modifying. While they often cannot legally sell these creations, many have turned to platforms like Patreon to receive donations from fans—support that technically doesn’t violate copyright law, since it’s not direct monetization of the games themselves.
A perfect example of this is Garry’s Mod, itself a mod of the Half-Life 2 engine. What started as a physics sandbox has now become an expansive platform for user-generated content and comedy series like the wildly popular Skibidi Toilet videos on YouTube. Many former game industry employees—disillusioned by by corporate creative limitations or burnout—have joined the modding scene, using it as a portfolio of sorts.
But modding can exist in a complex legal gray area, responses from game companies vary wildly. Some, like Bethesda, have embraced it—building mod marketplaces or open modding tools directly into their games. Others, like Nintendo, aggressively protect their IP and frequently issue takedown notices. This dichotomy reflects broader debates over user agency, artistic ownership, and the role of fan communities in shaping the future of gaming.
Emulation: Digital Preservation of Gaming’s Past

Running parallel to the modding revolution is the rise of emulation, another player-driven response to the increasing unavailability—and unaffordability—of gaming. Emulation is the process by which software allows a modern device to mimic the hardware of older systems. As the average computer becomes exponentially more powerful, emulators can not only run old games but can enhance them—improving textures, increasing frame rates, and applying modern effects. It’s a form of effortless remastering, done not by studios, but by fans.
Emulation doesn’t just let us play old games. It also lets us create new ones. Assets from older consoles can be modified and repurposed to develop entirely new games. A prime example is Goodboy Galaxy, a Game Boy Advance title created as a kind of satirical throwback. While it runs on old hardware specs, the game is packed with modern design sensibilities and storytelling techniques. It feels like a time capsule—one that never existed until now.

More importantly, emulation has become a vital tool for game preservation. Physical media—discs, cartridges, and instruction manuals—are disappearing from eBay listings and secondhand stores. And unlike books or films, many games have no legal or institutional backup. Once the hardware fails or the servers go offline, these titles are lost forever.
Emulators give us a digital way to keep that history alive. Massive libraries of games that would otherwise be unavailable—some obscure, others cult classics—are now being rediscovered by younger generations. Emulation has become gamings great Library of Alexandria.
But that preservation comes with ethical and legal tensions. While emulators themselves are legal, distributing ROMs (the game files) often isn't. Most of these online archives exist in a legal limbo, accessible yet technically illegal. Still, there's a growing argument—especially from archivists, scholars, and even some developers—that piracy may be the only way to save some of these titles. Many are orphaned works, abandoned by their publishers, with no clear path to re-release. In these cases, emulation is less a crime and more an act of cultural conservation.
Portable Devices and the Emulation Renaissance
Mobile technology has supercharged this emulation boom. Your average Android phone today can run full PlayStation 2 games through native emulation apps—sometimes better than the original hardware.

The Nintendo Switch has dominated the handheld market by bridging the gap between portable and home consoles. But that dominance has created a vacuum—a challenge waiting to be met. Enter the flood of Android-based handhelds from Chinese tech companies. These pocket-sized powerhouses run on open-source operating systems, support Bluetooth controllers, and connect to televisions. They're not just Nintendo Switch competitors—they’re also positioning themselves against SmartTVs and even smartphones.
What sets them apart is their function as dedicated emulation devices. PlayStation 2, GameCube, Dreamcast, and even PS3 games are playable on devices the size of a Kindle. You can play Call of Duty Mobile or Final Fantasy Tactics Advance on the same platform you use to stream Netflix. It's a new era where casual gaming meets deep gaming history, and it's driven not by Sony or Microsoft, but by loosely organized hardware collectives and software communities.
There are still hurdles. Setting up these devices takes time. Emulators must be installed, ROMs sourced and organized, and the user interface customized. More complex emulation often demands higher technical literacy, locking out the more casual crowd. And of course, the murky legality of downloading ROMs remains a significant barrier for many users.
But those obstacles are shrinking. Front-end launchers and curated ROM sets are making emulation plug-and-play, and legal challenges have failed to slow the global spread of this movement. The legal implications of this business means that most mainstream western companies will not enter this market, allowing both foreign and even underground domestic markets in a strategic position to take advantage of this market void.
Conclusion: Collapse or Transformation?
It’s becoming increasingly clear that the multi-billion-dollar gaming industry is buckling under its own weight. Bloated budgets, risk-averse publishers, broken release cycles, and mass layoffs are revealing an industry in decline. But that doesn't mean gaming itself is going away. Far from it. In fact, we’re witnessing the early signs of a paradigm shift.
But for the vast majority of gamers, the future may not be so glossy. It might look more like a post-apocalypse—a digital wasteland where abandoned IPs, fan projects, and bootleg devices coexist. And in that space, the underground thrives.

California, with its deep tech roots and cultural creativity, is poised to become a major hub for post-industry gaming innovation. Cities like Austin, Texas, and New York are also cultivating vibrant local game scenes rooted in indie development and community projects.
China, meanwhile, is positioning itself to lead the next wave of hardware innovation, producing the hybrid devices that blend emulation, mobile gaming, and streaming into one affordable package. These machines aren’t bound by legacy console wars. They’re carving out a new territory altogether—one where form and function matter more than brand loyalty.
Ultimately, whoever benefits most, one thing is clear: the future of gaming is no longer in the hands of billion-dollar publishers. It belongs to the coders, the modders, the emulators, and the passionate communities reclaiming games as a shared cultural artform—not a product to be milked dry.
Gaming isn’t dying. It’s being reborn.




Comments